Imagine Intoarsa La Proiector
06.09.2019 admin
Marfa poate fi returnata, de catre client la sediul vanzatorului, in termen de 7 zile de la data primirii produsului (cf.art.9/OG106/1999), rambursarea sumelor platite efectuindu-se in maxim 15 zile de la returnarea produsuluii in buna regula (art.16/OG 106/99). Mi s-a intors imaginea de la monitor invers, pe verticala si nu stiu ce sa-i fac Ce trebuie sa-i fac sa fie la normal, acum stau cu el pe o parte HELPPP URGENT fundita MAREEEE. Zac brown band 2019 tour.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia” as Want to Read:
Rate this book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of A Thousand Plateaus by Gilles Deleuze.
Not the book you’re looking for?Preview — A Thousand Plateaus by Gilles Deleuze
Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) was Professor of Philosophy at the University of Paris VIII. He is a key figure in poststructuralism, and one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century. Felix Guattari (1930-1992) was a psychoanalyst at the la Borde Clinic, as well as being a major social theorist and radical activist.
A Thousand Plateaus is part of Deleuze an..more
A Thousand Plateaus is part of Deleuze an..more
Published 1987 by University of Minnesota Press
To see what your friends thought of this book,please sign up.
To ask other readers questions aboutA Thousand Plateaus,please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
PeterIt's good to read them both, in either Order. ATP might come first given your coordinates, but don't worry, you don't have to read them linearly.
Best World Philosophy Book 906 books — 1,339 voters
The Most Influential Books in History 1,174 books — 4,837 voters
More lists with this book..
Rating details
Plateaus is required reading for Assange fans and enemies, as well as those who don't give a fig but carry a Master or Visa card or just have a particular bent for Continental theory.
According to Deleuze and Guattari Western thought is dominated by a structure of knowledge they call aboresence. This way of knowing is tree-like, vertical, and centralized. For instance, in biology, we have Linnean taxonomies. In chemistry, we have Porphyrian trees. In linguistics we have Chomskyan sentence trees...more
May 21, 2007Peter Anderson rated it it was amazing
Aug 09, 2010El rated it really liked it Shelves: permanent-collection, cultural-studies-and-other, cuckoos, defunct-pretentious-book-club
August 9, 2010
We will be reading this for our next bookclub selection (because it follows Animals Make Us Human: Creating the Best Life for Animals so well?). Once my boyfriend finds his second copy of this I'll get started. Yes, my boyfriend is the kind of person who owns two copies of this book. Intentionally.
I would also like to mention that I will be reading this at the mercy of the one who decided we should read this (who is not my boyfriend, believe it or not - apparently there are other p..more
We will be reading this for our next bookclub selection (because it follows Animals Make Us Human: Creating the Best Life for Animals so well?). Once my boyfriend finds his second copy of this I'll get started. Yes, my boyfriend is the kind of person who owns two copies of this book. Intentionally.
I would also like to mention that I will be reading this at the mercy of the one who decided we should read this (who is not my boyfriend, believe it or not - apparently there are other p..more
The most difficult book ever written. EVER. But it’s also liberating as hell. Just sit back and enjoy how strange it makes you feel. And then how ecstatic, confused, angry, etc., all at once. But if you're ever climbing and all of a sudden you realize that you're getting it, like, really getting it, then hang on and stay with it because it will probably change your life when you get to the top. And that feels pretty groovy. Especially when you really have to work for the plateau. It ain’t easy b..more
Tired of seeing everything from the point of view of the individual? Bored of anthropomorphism? This might be the book for you. This book changed the way I think about thinking. Swirls in your pot of boiling water will seem as complex and contingent as hurricanes. The migration of humans will look like the crawling of ants. Most importantly, though, Deleuze and Guattari show everything as a process of strategic movement through territory, whether it be the formation of layers of sediment or noma..more
Nov 29, 2017chaos rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
I hate this fucking book.
Dec 31, 2018Maxwell rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
You’d be forgiven for walking away from Anti-Oedipus thinking that deterritorialization is positive and liberatory force, and the circumscription of reterritorialization, reactionary and oppressive. Anti-Oedipus endorses schizophrenia, immanence and multiplicity while still using binary terms for its lavish metaphysics. This is to some degree inevitable. A Thousand Plateaus begins the process of ungluing these manichean oppositions but doesn’t quite undo the latent hierarchies. A Thousand Platea..more
The idea: Society is a vertically organized enterprise. Different concepts are used to attempt to implement a sort of control over others; the control of language, and of grammar itself, could be considered a type of imperialism..to paraphrase, there's no quicker way to implement a sort of control over a group of people than to ensure that they cannot have a voice within a society without adhering to strictly delineated guideline regarding how to write/how to speak. In response to the verticall..more
This is basically a nonreview: like a restless nomad I would read several pages of one section and then find myself completely unable to go on, and then I’d move to the next one. Same for the next chapter and the next.
Right from the beginning I knew I had already read too much of this type of writing to have much patience for it. Here’re the authors justifying the fact that they affixed their names to the books they write:
“Why have we kept our own names? Out of habit, purely out of habit. To ma..more
Right from the beginning I knew I had already read too much of this type of writing to have much patience for it. Here’re the authors justifying the fact that they affixed their names to the books they write:
“Why have we kept our own names? Out of habit, purely out of habit. To ma..more
I am torn on this review and rating. On the one-hand I recognize this as one of the quintessential post-modern tomes up there with Lyotard's Postmodern Condition or Foucault's The Archaeology of Knowledge but on the other hand, the quixotic hubris in this text is almost overbearing. It really depends on how I am looking at the purpose of the writing. If i try to look at it like a true philosophical text with intended insight and description, it falls completely flat. It truly is the inane charti..more
Jan 06, 2009Troy rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
I've finally finished this difficult, confusing, brilliant book.
I've been reading it for years; off and on; a chapter here, a chapter there. (And a warning about that: in the beginning of this book, the authors claim that you can read the book like a record player, reading a chapter here and a chapter there, but that really isn't true. The book rhymes, sure, but it also builds concepts and ideas, starting from some basic premises and building up to some pretty in-depth case studies. It's really..more
I've been reading it for years; off and on; a chapter here, a chapter there. (And a warning about that: in the beginning of this book, the authors claim that you can read the book like a record player, reading a chapter here and a chapter there, but that really isn't true. The book rhymes, sure, but it also builds concepts and ideas, starting from some basic premises and building up to some pretty in-depth case studies. It's really..more
Any book of philosophy that features a chapter in which a geologist (named Challenger no less) undergoes a metamorphosis while delivering a lecture is pretty good. What takes it to the next level is what Challenger the geologist turns into: a lobster! This book has it all from Deleuze and Guattari: wolf packs, war machines, nomadologies, becomings-animal, rhizomes, the differences between the games of Go and Chess, and plenty of rips on Freud and psychoanalysis. My favorite chapters were the int..more
Nov 21, 2008Avinash Rajagopal rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
I actually have read this book. I have a vague idea of what its about, but I cannot claim to understand all of it. That in no way detracted from sheer reading pleasure.
Some of their ideas such as rhizomatic thinking and the body without organs are so beautiful you can stand and stare at them for hours. As for some of the other ideas, i have no clue what they're talking about.
They suggest that you read their book like listening to a concert. They also suggest that the book's chapters are plateaus..more
Some of their ideas such as rhizomatic thinking and the body without organs are so beautiful you can stand and stare at them for hours. As for some of the other ideas, i have no clue what they're talking about.
They suggest that you read their book like listening to a concert. They also suggest that the book's chapters are plateaus..more
Dec 22, 2007Andrew added it
Fucking wow. I read Deleuze for the first time when my sophomore year of college, and found him impenetrable and obnoxious, but now, after falling in love with some people inspired by Deleuze (Edward Soja, Antonio Negri, etc.), I'm back on the bandwagon. Not only does it provide a phenomenal perspective on the world that will help any student of literature, psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science, art, etc., but also is extremely good at curing internal fascist malaise. Lovely!
Jun 19, 2007Brian Kubarycz rated it really liked it
Imagine Intoarsa La Proiector Live
this book has no ending, or beginning for that matter.
infinitely provocative but nearly impossible to read.
presupposes familiarity with a vast array of recondite materials, from a number of different disciplines. more than most students could be expected to weed through in a lifetime.
infinitely provocative but nearly impossible to read.
presupposes familiarity with a vast array of recondite materials, from a number of different disciplines. more than most students could be expected to weed through in a lifetime.
Jun 24, 2008Charlie rated it it was amazing
Finally, finally, I have finished this book, I was very definitely punching above my weight trying to read this, but overall I have enjoyed it thoroughly, well perhaps not enjoyed the actual reading of it, but this book has provided such a vast resource of ideas for me, I don't regret a single one of the many months that it has taken me to read through this, this is a huge personal achievement for me, now that I have read this I feel like I could read anything.
For the most of this book the subje..more
For the most of this book the subje..more
Jun 29, 2007Sachin rated it really liked it · review of another edition
The second part of Deleuze and Guattari's two volume mind boggling and yet a playful critique of capitalism is full of insights and useful ideas. They do manage to take the language of critical theory forward from Lacan, Derrida and Foucault. One of the most intersting and useful metaphor is the metaphor of rhizome used instead of hierarchic logic of the metaphor of `tree'. One of the most important philosophical treatise of this `post modern' era...more
Jun 08, 2010Ashley rated it did not like it · review of another edition
If you can make head-or-tails of this crap then this rating doesn't apply to you. It would probably be best if you read this outside a course with any expectations because if you're trying to figure out how you'll apply this to a paper as you read you'll never get anywhere. It's just strange and nonsensical. Even the most learned literary critic or psychoanalyst would have trouble following this text.
Aug 14, 2017Jake rated it did not like it · review of another edition
This book is pseudo-intellectual garbage. The striations and stratifications of the molar body without organs and deterritorialized flows of jargon were empty of meaning. Crap. Took forever to read it all. 'Anti-Oedipus' had a little thought involved at least.
unintelligible does not equal brilliant
Jan 31, 2019Antonio Kowatsch rated it it was amazing
Holy smokes. This is probably one of the most interesting books ever written. It is however very confusing for people who are not familiar with the jargon.
It will literally change how you look at the world.
The West has embraced a tree-like structure of order and understanding whereas the East has embraced a more rhizomatic understanding. And that's what this book focuses on. The concept of rhizomatic maps. This dichotomy is also the reason why Eastern philosophy is so very different from Weste..more
It will literally change how you look at the world.
The West has embraced a tree-like structure of order and understanding whereas the East has embraced a more rhizomatic understanding. And that's what this book focuses on. The concept of rhizomatic maps. This dichotomy is also the reason why Eastern philosophy is so very different from Weste..more
Aug 21, 2013Lesley Battler rated it it was amazing
For some reason no one seems interested in my reality TV series: DIY Philosophy. It's so full of action and suspense I can't understand why no one will pick it up.
Epidsode 1: I brew a pot of hazelnut coffee, feed the cats, sit down at my dining room table, place Deleuze and Guattari's 1000 Plateaus on my lap, pissing off the resident velociraptor who gives me that you're-such-a-loser-when-can-i-eat-you look.
Episode 2: I begin reading. I furrow my brow, sip coffee, continue reading. As soon as th..more
Feb 09, 2017Alex Lee rated it it was amazingEpidsode 1: I brew a pot of hazelnut coffee, feed the cats, sit down at my dining room table, place Deleuze and Guattari's 1000 Plateaus on my lap, pissing off the resident velociraptor who gives me that you're-such-a-loser-when-can-i-eat-you look.
Episode 2: I begin reading. I furrow my brow, sip coffee, continue reading. As soon as th..more
Shelves: favorites, economics, philosophy, mystical, critical-theory, history, 2017
This is my second time reading this book, maybe 15 years later. I see how what others have said about Deleuze (and Guattari) to be true; that they are Kantian phenomenologists, (post-)Marxists, and so on. This book is an art work in that they are able through partial abstraction, subordinate a new set of class/categorizational structure for how we should consider various kinds of relations. They outline only the barest minimum while showing that these kinds of relations are beings in-themselves..more
Jun 25, 2012Ben rated it liked it
I like Deleuze. A lot. I think, insofar as this is meaningful to say, he is right. But I don't know that he is a good writer. He tends to get off task, run off on these giant tangents that are sometimes charming, but, as this VERY LONG book progresses, get increasingly more tedious and less productive. The becoming-woman discussion is a case in point for me. Deleuze spends more time trying to convince us that he has no intention of insulting transvestites and their accomplishments than he does a..more
Aug 31, 2011Jonfaith rated it liked it
I felt off balance with this one, especially in stark relief to Anti-Oedipus. I'm not suggesting I deftly maneuvered through that one, but the posture remained intact. I largely flailed and screeched during my readinging and kept it such until I read that Alec Empire loves this as well as some squatters in St. Petersburg: I read that second detail Wired magazine. Yeah, I bought a pair of copies of that back in the early months of Clinton's second term. It is strange, I recall so much of that art..more
Aug 28, 2014Alex Obrigewitsch rated it it was amazing
Once again, Deleuze and Guattari give me words to outline the processes and flows of my own thought.
I am constantly in a process of deterritorialization, attempting to break free of the systems and stagnations.
I am a nomad of thought, of the heart, for thinking is being on the way, becoming.
All is interconnected in flowing over, through and across.
All lines must work out their motion before they can be detangled from the real. This book is an organ on the way to the complete decoding and detraci..more
I am constantly in a process of deterritorialization, attempting to break free of the systems and stagnations.
I am a nomad of thought, of the heart, for thinking is being on the way, becoming.
All is interconnected in flowing over, through and across.
All lines must work out their motion before they can be detangled from the real. This book is an organ on the way to the complete decoding and detraci..more
Apr 27, 2014Diego Navarro rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Having by now most likely repeatedly revisited every section of _A thousand plateaus_ in numerous editions (french, pt-Portugal, pt-France, spanish, english), I still mark this as 'read' with significant trepidation. I did move from an endless loop of rereading it out of order, as someone studies a holy book.
You can easily lose two or three years with this. Worth it, ultimately.
You can easily lose two or three years with this. Worth it, ultimately.
Sep 27, 2012David added it
This is mind blowing. I don't think I totally understand everything but reading it and imagining what it means is a revelation. It seems to promote a consciousness of the world that is devoid of hierarchy and shatters fundamental categories. I decided to read this intermittently so far I finished chapter 5.
Apr 03, 2007courtney rated it really liked it · review of another edition
i loved reading this -- it was exciting and confrontational and challenged the primacy of psychoanalysis and all sorts of other 20th century 'givens.' to say that i READ the book is a lie. i read about 50-100 pages of it (the section dealing with the Body without Organs, a plane of being that we all strive towards) and plan of reading further into it.
Great article that made me want to attempt this author: http://htmlgiant.com/random/the-begin..
| topics | posts | views | last activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goodreads Librari..:another type of correct assignment of Deleuze's quotes | 3 | 33 | Sep 18, 2016 10:48AM |
| Goodreads Librari..:correct assignment of Deleuze's quotes | 6 | 20 | Sep 16, 2016 08:24AM |
Recommend ItStatsRecent Status Updates
See similar books…
See top shelves…
1,052followers
Deleuze is a key figure in postmodern French philosophy. Considering himself an empiricist and a vitalist, his body of work, which rests upon concepts such as multiplicity, constructivism, difference and desire, stands at a substantial remove from the main traditions of 20th century Continental thought. His thought locates him as an influential figure in present-day considerations of society, crea..more
“A concept is a brick. It can be used to build a courthouse of reason. Or it can be thrown through the window.” — 2262 likes
“Bring something incomprehensible into the world!” — 187 likes
More quotes…